Persistence, Retro and Lady Danger Persistense Retro D for danger #macbrushes #lipsticks #cosmetics #swatches #mac #onmacbrushes$0 on MAC Lipsticks swatches MAC CosmeticsMAC Lipsticks swatches MAC Cosmetics See more. Persistence, Retro and Lady Danger Persistense Retro D for danger #macbrushes #lipsticks #cosmetics #swatches #mac #onmacbrushes$0 on MAC Lipsticks swatches MAC CosmeticsMAC Lipsticks swatches MAC Cosmetics See more.
I have a new favorite lip color! MAC D for Danger lipstick is a gorgeous berry shade with a matte finish. I love it! I have been looking for a berry lip color for a while now, but usually it’s too purple, so I’m very excited when I found this shade. D for Danger is a permanent lipstick shade at MAC. I recently found it when I was browsing their Retro Matte collection.
Anyways, I paired UD Naked Smoky with this berry lips. I went with a winged liner, and bronze on the lids. Nothing too dark on the crease since I want the focus to be on the winged liner itself. This look is quite heavy on both eyes and lips, but I don’t quite mind it. I think this will look nice for a party. For a day look, I probably will leave the eyes bare, just mascara and groomed brows, leaving the lips to be the focus of the attention.
I have done a smoky eye look using UD Naked Smoky in my previous tutorial, please check it out!
Free scanner software for mac. Products used
Eyes
- Primer – Urban Decay Primer Potion “Original”
- Transition – UD Naked Smoky “Combust”
- Crease/outer lid – UD Naked Smoky “Whiskey”
- Middle lid – UD Naked Smoky “Dirtysweet”
- Inner corner – UD Naked Smoky “High”
- Winged liner/outer corner of lower lid – Maybelline “Eye Studio Lasting Drama Gel Liner in Black”
- Waterline – L’oreal “Voluminous Smoldering eyeliner”
- Brows – Anastasia Brow Wiz “Taupe” and “Medium Brown”
- Falsies – Gwiyomi Boutique false lashes “no. 3”
Hulu for mac. Face
![D For Danger Mac D For Danger Mac](/uploads/1/3/4/3/134317398/380593291.jpg)
- Primer – Becca “Ever Matte Poreless Priming Perfector”
- Foundation – NARS Luminous Weightless Foundation “Punjab”
- Concealer – NARS Radiant Creamy Concealer “Custard”
- Setting powder – CoverFX translucent setting powder
Mac D For Danger
Cheeks
- Contour – Smashbox contour kit “contour” shade
- Cheeks – NARS “Mata Hari” blush
Lips
D For Danger Mac
- Lipstick – MAC “D for Danger”
Application-how did this product apply? glidestugs |
Moisturizing-how moisturizing is this product? hydratingdrying |
Long-Wearing-how long-wearing is this product? stays all daydisappears quickly |
Colour-does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube? |
Pigmentation-how pigmented is this product? |
Luster-how lustrous is this product? |
Buildable-how buildable(ability to build up more color) is this product? builds easilyhard to build |
Feathering-how feathering is this product? stays putfeathers or bleeds |
Texture-how is the texture of this product? smoothgritty |
Value-how would you rate the value of this product overall? overdeliveredunderdelivered |
Airy for mac coupon code. Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews so far: Feedback for the application category the current four is a sign that responses to 'how did this product apply?' generally indicate glides. Considering feedback for the colour category the current rating of six indicates considering the question 'does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?' heavily favor true to colour. Considering the pigmentation category the rating of six suggests reviewers in response to the 'how pigmented is this product?' primarily suggest opaque. Reviewing the luster category a rating of one suggests users & critics evaluating 'how lustrous is this product?' generally suggest matte. Looking at review rankings for the texture category an average total of five suggests replies to 'how is the texture of this product?' frequently lean smooth.
D For Danger Mac Lipstick Swatch
at blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you.
without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.
as an example, one rating criteria for lipsticks is luster. luster ranges from matte to glossy. Matte might be a desired quality for you, while glossy might be desired for someone else. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.
an added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. you can identify that a product is rated highly for luster without reading a lot of text. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. apples to apples, if you will.
D For Danger Mac Lopstic Video
we would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to .